How Much Should You Invest in Branding?

A practical guide to brand investment for mission-driven founders navigating growth, regulation, and stakeholder complexity

Hello friends, it feels good to be back in your inbox! I hope your summer is going well. The studio has been buzzing with activity these past few months, and I’m grateful to be sitting at my desk on a hot Sunday afternoon, finding the rhythm of my pen again.

This week, we’re getting back to the fundamentals with our Brand Foundations Series discussing the common questions and needs I see working with founders and startups.

The next question arrives in my inbox at least once a week, usually from a founder caught between competing priorities: "We know we need to invest in our brand, but we're not sure how much is enough… or too much!"

This tension is particularly acute in mission-driven technology companies, where founders often face a stark choice: Should they invest their precious funding in additional research and development, or dedicate resources to building a brand that could attract the partnerships and trust necessary for adoption?

It's a dilemma that captures the core challenge facing every founder working on technology or services that could genuinely improve the world: how do you balance the urgent need to perfect your innovation with the equally urgent need to ensure that what you are building can actually reach the people it's designed to help?

This is the paradox facing every mission-driven founder: brand investment feels simultaneously essential and indulgent. You know you can make an impact, but you're acutely aware that brilliant innovations die in obscurity every day.

The truth is, there's no universal formula for brand investment. But there are frameworks that can help you make decisions aligned with your mission, your growth stage, and the unique dynamics of your industry.

The False Choice Between Brand and Substance

Before we dive into numbers and frameworks, we need to address a fundamental misconception that plagues mission-driven founders: the belief that investing in brand somehow detracts from investing in substance.

This false dichotomy is particularly pronounced in science and technology companies working on solutions with real-world impact, where founders often feel that every dollar spent on "marketing" is a dollar not spent on research, development, or achieving their mission. Yet I've observed how promising technologies can struggle to gain traction not because they aren't superior, but because they can't effectively communicate their value to the complex ecosystem of stakeholders they need to serve.

Brand investment, when done thoughtfully, doesn't compete with your mission… it amplifies it. Consider the challenge facing any technology company developing solutions that could significantly improve outcomes in their field. Even with breakthrough innovation, the path to adoption requires building trust across an incredibly diverse set of stakeholders.

What becomes clear in these situations is that even the most revolutionary technology requires trust to find adoption. End users need to trust that the solution understands their specific needs. Decision-makers need to trust that the approach is sound and reliable. Regulators (where applicable) need to trust that the methodology meets their standards. Investors need to trust that the team can execute at scale.

Building that trust—across such a diverse set of stakeholders—requires a coherent brand strategy that can translate complex innovation into clear value propositions for each audience. The investment in brand doesn't detract from the mission; it creates the conditions for that mission to succeed.

Understanding Brand Investment Across Organizational Stages

Your approach to brand investment should align with your organization's current reality and growth trajectory. What makes sense for a research team just beginning to translate their discoveries into market applications is vastly different from what an established organization needs as they expand into new markets or stakeholder groups.

Foundation Stage: Clarity Before Scale

Whether you're a newly independent research group, a university spinout, or a self-funded venture in its early months, your brand investment should focus on establishing credibility and clarity rather than broad visibility.

Typical Investment Range: $15,000-$35,000 annually
Primary Focus: Brand foundation, stakeholder research, core messaging development

At this stage, the goal isn't to reach everyone—it's to ensure that when you do reach the right people, your message resonates with clarity and authority. This might mean investing in deep stakeholder research to understand how different audiences currently perceive solutions in your space, or developing a clear articulation of your unique value proposition that works across multiple contexts.

For organizations in this stage, brand investment often includes:

• Comprehensive stakeholder research and positioning development

• Core brand framework and messaging architecture

• Essential visual identity and digital presence

• Content strategy foundation for thought leadership

• Internal guidelines to ensure consistency as the team grows

Growth Stage: Building Recognition While Maintaining Integrity

As your organization gains traction—whether through successful pilot programs, key partnerships, or expanding research applications—your brand investment should focus on building broader awareness while maintaining the authenticity that got you here.

Typical Investment Range: $35,000-$75,000 annually
Primary Focus: Market education, thought leadership, partnership development

This stage often requires the most nuanced approach to brand investment. You're no longer just establishing credibility with a small group of early adopters; you're working to build trust with a broader ecosystem of stakeholders who may have different priorities, concerns, and decision-making processes.

Organizations at this stage often invest in:

• Targeted content strategies for multiple stakeholder groups

• Industry conference presence and speaking opportunities

• Educational initiatives that position the organization as a thought leader

• Case study development that demonstrates real-world impact

• Partnership marketing that leverages credible third-party validation

Established Stage: Leadership and Legacy

For organizations that have achieved initial market success and are now focused on long-term impact and industry influence, brand investment shifts toward thought leadership and ecosystem development.

Typical Investment Range: $50,000-$150,000+ annually
Primary Focus: Industry leadership, category influence, ecosystem development

At this stage, you're not just building awareness—you're actively shaping conversations in your field and establishing your organization as a driving force for positive change.

Framework: The Mission-Driven Investment Calculator

Rather than relying on generic industry percentages, use this framework to determine your optimal brand investment level based on your organization's specific context:

Base Investment Assessment

Start with Organizational Context:

• Foundation stage organization: $15K-$35K baseline

• Growth stage organization: $35K-$75K baseline

• Established organization: $50K-$150K+ baseline

Stakeholder Complexity Modifier

The more diverse your stakeholder ecosystem, the more sophisticated your brand approach needs to be:

• Single primary audience: No adjustment

• 2-3 distinct stakeholder groups: Add $10K-$15K

• 4+ diverse stakeholder groups: Add $20K-$30K

Mission-driven organizations typically serve multiple constituencies—researchers, practitioners, regulators, funders, and end beneficiaries—each requiring tailored approaches to build trust and understanding.

Mission Complexity Factor

Impact Scope Considerations:

• Local/regional impact: Standard investment

• National influence: Add $15K-$25K

• Global reach or multi-sector impact: Add $25K-$50K

Market Position Modifier

Your Role in the Ecosystem:

• Established field with clear standards: Standard investment

• Emerging field requiring education: Add $10K-$20K

• Creating entirely new category: Add $20K-$40K

When you're pioneering new approaches or challenging existing paradigms, you need additional investment to educate stakeholders and build confidence in novel solutions.

ROI: Measuring Brand Investment Returns

The challenge with brand investment, particularly in healthcare, is that returns often manifest over longer time horizons and through indirect metrics. However, there are leading indicators that can help you track whether your investment is working:

Immediate Indicators (0-6 months)

• Stakeholder research showing improved brand perception

• Increased inbound interest from target audiences

• Higher conversion rates from marketing qualified leads

• Improved employee retention and recruitment success

Medium-term Indicators (6-18 months)

• Shortened sales cycles within target segments

• Increased average deal size or partnership value

• Enhanced investor interest and valuation premiums

• Industry recognition and thought leadership opportunities

Long-term Indicators (18+ months)

• Market share growth within target segments

• Premium pricing acceptance vs. competitors

• Strategic partnership opportunities

• Category leadership recognition

Common Investment Mistakes

Through working with dozens of mission-driven tech companies, I've identified several patterns that consistently undermine brand investment effectiveness:

The "Field of Dreams" Fallacy

Many technical founders believe that building superior technology automatically creates brand value. They invest minimally in brand, assuming that product quality will drive awareness and adoption organically.

This rarely works in healthcare, where adoption requires not just superior technology but also trust, education, and relationship-building across complex stakeholder networks.

The "Spray and Pray" Approach

When organizations do invest in brand, they often try to reach everyone at once rather than focusing on their highest-value segments. This is particularly tempting for mission-driven organizations whose technology could theoretically benefit multiple industries or use cases. (If you tell me your audience is everyone, I WILL slap your hand with a ruler.)

The challenge is that generic messaging rarely resonates with anyone deeply enough to drive action. A platform that could optimize clinical trials might simultaneously target academic researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and contract research organizations—but each group has fundamentally different priorities, decision-making processes, and definitions of value. Without really tight messaging, the brand investment gets diluted across too many audiences to create meaningful impact with any of them.

The more effective approach is often to become the definitive solution for one specific segment first, then expand from that position of strength. An organization that becomes known as the go-to solution for rare disease trials, for example, can build deeper relationships and stronger market position than one that tries to be everything to everyone from the start.

The "Set It and Forget It" Strategy

Brand building requires sustained investment over time, particularly in industries where trust develops slowly. Companies that make big initial investments but then reduce brand spending often find their momentum stalling just as it was building.

The "Vanity Metrics" Trap

Many companies optimize their brand investment around easily measured but ultimately meaningless metrics—social media followers, website traffic, or press mentions—rather than focusing on the stakeholder perception and business outcomes that actually drive growth.

Practical Implementation: Your Next Steps

If you're ready to make more strategic brand investments, here's how to begin:

Month 1: Assessment and Planning

• Conduct stakeholder research to understand current brand perceptions

• Map your competitive landscape and identify differentiation opportunities

• Calculate your optimal investment level using the framework above

• Audit current brand assets and identify gaps

Month 2-3: Foundation Building

• Develop or refine your brand positioning and messaging framework

• Create stakeholder-specific value propositions

• Establish content strategy and editorial calendar

• Set up measurement systems for tracking brand ROI

Month 4-6: Implementation and Testing

• Launch targeted brand campaigns for your highest-value segments

• Begin consistent thought leadership content publication

• Engage in relevant industry events and partnerships

• Test and iterate messaging based on stakeholder feedback

Ongoing: Optimization and Scale

• Regularly review brand perception research

• Adjust investment levels based on ROI indicators

• Expand successful approaches to additional stakeholder groups

• Maintain consistency while adapting to market evolution

The Courage to Invest in Tomorrow

The question isn't whether you can afford to invest in your brand, it's whether you can afford not to. Every day you delay building trust, credibility, and awareness is another day your innovation remains disconnected from the people it could help.

For mission-driven founders, this takes on even greater urgency. You're not just building a company, you're working to solve problems that matter. The faster you can build the trust and awareness necessary for adoption, the sooner you can deliver on your mission to improve lives.

Consider the cold truth: your technology might be revolutionary, but change requires more innovation, it takes adoption. Brand investment is what transforms breakthrough science into widespread impact.

The only question that remains is: How much is your mission worth?

---

Continue Your Brand Foundation Journey

This article is part of our Brand Foundations Series, designed to guide mission-driven founders through every aspect of building authentic, effective brands.